Rideau interviewed professionals such as Warden John Whitley who agreed with the solution, thus strengthening his credibility. Secondly, Rideau proposes that young criminals need to be rehabilitated instead of locked up for life. Through rehabilitation, professionals can inspire change, maturity, and education, giving these youngsters a chance to properly understand society and how to abide by its rules. Lastly, Rideau strongly believes that the government should diligently work to prevent the criminal acts before they happen.
He blames politicians for imposing tougher policies and locking up more people instead of providing help because they have hypocritical intentions. Politicians merely aim to rack up statistics for reelection purposes. Overall, Wilbert Rideau provides a balanced view on the subject, eloquently raising his points to the reader. Furthermore, his passion for the issue is blatant as he provides practical solutions, sincerely hoping to aid the inmates unjustly trapped for life.
By singling out the true perpetrators, mainly politicians and policy makers, Rideau is actually attacking society as a whole and questioning its intentions of genuinely aiming to improve and progress. However, Rideau fails to realize that by grouping all criminals together, he cannot gain sympathy from policy changers, as there is much work involved in separating the people who might have changed if given the chance, from those who will repeat doing offenses.
The writer does not realize that taking that chance can very well lead to negative results and officials cannot rush into releasing people with criminal pasts solely because the system is corrupted in a few areas. This will just not lower the crime-rate, but decrease the prison population. Prison is obviously not working on rehabilitating prisoners because there are prisoners who are released, but they don't return to prison. Yet, the majority of prisoners released do go back to jail.
Criminals think they're not going to get caught or they're so emotionally desperate or psychologically distressed that they don't care about the consequences. To lower the recidivism prisons should offer real rehabilitation to prisoners.
Criminals are not all waste people; most of them could just have haven a crisis that make them commit the crimes. Rehabilitation can work for them, but until prisons do more for rehabilitation prisoners won't change. The convict who enters prison illiterate will probably leave the same way. To change this prison should be less a place to.
Get Access. Read More. Argumentative Essay: The Death Of Michael Brown Words 8 Pages implication to people getting felonies, there is an associated relation to the racial makeup of juries Hersh. Politician's role in the prison system is to sell the idea to the public that prison makes society safer. Prisons don't work because they don't focus on the person's growth in prison.
Most people don't even survive in prison completely knocking down the importance of the institution. Change is uncommon in prison because rehabilitation and educated people They should be forced to work, like making parts for machines or anything that helps out society.
Convicts would do this work for their whole lives. I dont like the idea of taking someone's life that could be innocent. If life in prison is so horrible then why doesn't anyone choose to take the death sentence instead? That's why people with life sentences should do hard labor making things for society. They work for the best interest of the child. The courts and the state try to help juveniles stay out of the prison system as much as they can but there are still many reasons why juveniles act in deviant ways.
Sometimes the family is in so much need of money that the parents have to work the whole day. This is often what happens in poor homes since the parents have to work for so long.
0コメント